Skip to main content

About your Search

Search Results 0 to 0 of about 1
Oct 20, 2012 5:15pm EDT
be able to get some revenues. it is partly true and partly not so true. all of us would be able to say that we could just get avenues threat cannot -- through economic growth. if the plan is to just cut taxes for the wealthiest and hope for the best combat has gotten us into this mess. we did that for 10 years. i think the real question is, what do they really mean by that? we also believe that we will eventually -- the economic growth is part of how we will raise revenues, but is that enough without any details about how we get there? is this just about lowering taxes for the wealthiest? i think we have done that before. i think we run a risk of knowing how to get to where we need to get to. we need to reduce the deficit for long-term economic growth. the fiscal quick is not talking about lowering taxes for only certain words. the disco foot is about the taxes for the middle class -- the fiscal cliff is about the taxes for the middle class. if you raise the taxes at the individual level, [indiscernible] that ever recognizes is necessary. -- set everybody recognizes is necessary. [
Search Results 0 to 0 of about 1